H.R. 8800 vs S. 4784: House vs Senate FY2027 NDAA
TL;DR
The House and Senate wrote different FY2027 defense authorization bills. H.R. 8800 ($1.15T, passed July 22, 2026, 216–212) leans into right-to-repair provisions and shipbuilding, including $500M for a second destroyer. S. 4784 ($1.14T, approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee) never reached the floor after cloture failed 50–46 on July 14, 2026. The chambers must reconcile the texts in conference before anything becomes law.
Side by side
| House — H.R. 8800 | Senate — S. 4784 | |
|---|---|---|
| Topline | $1.15T | $1.14T |
| Sections | 723 | 611 |
| Committee | HASC reported | SASC reported |
| Floor action | Passed Jul 22, 2026, 216–212 | Cloture failed Jul 14, 2026, 50–46 — stalled |
| Signature issues | Right to repair, second destroyer | Topline restraint, Iran language |
Where they differ most
- Right to repair. The House bill's right-to-repair provisions push the Pentagon to secure technical data and repair rights — a centerpiece the Senate version treats more cautiously.
- Shipbuilding. The House funds a second destroyer ($500M) and backs Sec. 123 multiyear destroyer procurement; track it all in the destroyer & shipbuilding topic.
- Iran & Middle East language. Competing Iran provisions are a major source of the Senate stalemate.
- Acquisition reform. Both bills extend the portfolio model from P.L. 119-60 — see the acquisition-reform sections.
Compare the text yourself
Don't take our word for it — the House vs Senate diff tool shows word-level comparisons of H.R. 8800 vs S. 4784 for every section, filterable by title, topic, or department. For the full annotated text, browse all 723 FY2027 sections.
Context
- FY2027 NDAA status — where the bill stands right now and what happens next.
- FY2027 vs FY2026 — how this year's bill compares to the enacted P.L. 119-60.